Coaches today have more software choices than ever. But not every platform is built with coaches in mind.
This guide compares TrainingPeaks, TriDot, and Training Tilt — three popular options that each take a different approach to training delivery and athlete management.
Feature / Focus | TrainingPeaks | TriDot | Training Tilt |
---|---|---|---|
Primary audience | Athletes and coaches | Mostly athletes | Coaches and coaching businesses |
Core approach | Data analytics & structured planning | Adaptive AI plan generation | Coaching platform with built-in business tools |
Plan creation | Manual or template-based | Automatically generated | Coach-authored (manual or AI-assisted) |
Adaptivity / automation | Limited automation | Strong AI adaptation | Optional assistance — coach controlled |
Analytics depth | Very deep & customizable | Moderate, simplified | Coach-focused analytics & insights |
Integrations | Extensive (Garmin, Wahoo, Zwift, etc.) | Good range | Core device syncs + manual import |
Brand presence | TrainingPeaks-branded | TriDot-branded | Coach-branded (white-label available) |
Business tools | External systems required | Minimal | Built-in payments, memberships & content |
Pricing model | Per-coach + per-athlete subscriptions | Subscription per athlete | Single coach plan covering all clients |
Best suited for | Data-driven coaches or self-coached athletes | Athletes who prefer automation | Coaches who value control, branding & business integration |
TrainingPeaks has been a cornerstone of endurance training software for over two decades. It’s known for detailed analytics and broad compatibility across devices and apps.
Exceptional data tracking and performance metrics
Strong ecosystem of third-party integrations
Widely adopted in endurance sports, making athlete onboarding easy
The platform also sells directly to athletes, which can blur ownership of the client relationship
Managing payments, memberships, or broader content delivery requires outside tools
Both coach and athlete need paid accounts for full functionality
Best for: Coaches who value deep analytics and don’t mind using separate tools for the business side of coaching.
TriDot’s hallmark is its AI-driven approach. It automatically generates and adjusts plans based on athlete data and feedback, aiming to optimize training without much manual input.
Automated adaptive plans that respond to performance
Simplified experience for self-coached athletes
Clear performance metrics within its scoring system
Limited manual control — AI logic drives most decisions
Few features for managing multiple athletes or scaling a coaching business
Lacks branding or customization options
Best for: Athletes who prefer automation, or coaches who provide light oversight without deep customization.
Training Tilt was created with a different goal: to serve coaches first.
Instead of marketing to athletes, it provides an integrated system for running a coaching business — combining training delivery, athlete management, and payments under one roof.
Coach-focused platform — doesn’t sell or market to athletes directly
Branded web and mobile experience under the coach’s name
Tools for workouts, communication, memberships, and payments
Optional AI features that help write structured workouts while keeping coach control
Smaller ecosystem than long-established competitors
Requires coaches to manage athlete onboarding themselves (since there’s no public marketplace)
Analytics depth is improving but not as extensive as TrainingPeaks’ advanced charts
Best for: Coaching businesses that want independence from athlete marketplaces and value having coaching, branding, and admin tools in one place.
Type of Coach | Recommended Platform | Why |
---|---|---|
Solo coach focusing on data analysis | TrainingPeaks | Deep metrics and established athlete familiarity. |
Coach offering light guidance alongside AI | TriDot | Automation and adaptive plans with minimal manual setup. |
Coach building a brand or scaling a business | Training Tilt | Combines coaching tools, client management, and payments under your brand. |
Club or multi-coach setup | Training Tilt | Shared dashboards, athlete visibility, and consistent team branding. |
Coach-athlete hybrid (selling plans + memberships) | Training Tilt | Built-in e-commerce and memberships simplify managing recurring income. |
Platform | Strengths | Considerations |
---|---|---|
TrainingPeaks | Established and widely used platform with advanced analytics and performance metrics. | Dual audience (athletes and coaches); requires external tools for payments and business operations. |
TriDot | Strong adaptive AI for self-coached athletes; simplified plan management. | Limited flexibility for coaches; less control over training adjustments and branding. |
Training Tilt | Coach-focused platform integrating training, communication, and business tools under your brand. | Smaller ecosystem and fewer public-facing athlete tools, but more control for coaching businesses. |
Each platform serves a slightly different audience.
TrainingPeaks excels at data analytics and remains a safe choice for established coaches.
TriDot appeals to athletes seeking automation and minimal setup.
Training Tilt focuses entirely on empowering coaches — giving them ownership of their brand, clients, and workflow without competing for athletes’ attention.
Choosing the right tool depends on your coaching style and priorities: control, automation, or ecosystem.
If your coaching model revolves around your own brand and long-term athlete relationships, consider which platform helps you maintain that ownership.